Biology War Committee

THE BIOLOGY WAR COMMITTEE


The Biology War Committee (BWC) was jointly established by the Association of Applied Biologists, the British Ecological Society, and the Society for Experimental Biology following discussions that began in 1940 and came to fruition in late 1941. Answerable to the Joint Government Committee of research organisations (Agricultural Research Council, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, and Medical Research Council), the BWC sought to inform government about ongoing biological research in universities and research institutes, and to identify new projects that might help the war effort.  In some instances, it was able to provide financial support using monies supplied by the Joint Committee.                                                         

 

Four of the BWC’s larger projects were:   

·      Medicinal plants; finding and exploiting pharmaceuticals and vitamins from plants, using Sphagnum moss as a wound dressing,                     

·      The writing of an advisory booklet, ‘Living in the Jungle’, for troops fighting in the tropics,

·      The preparation of a memorandum, ‘On the Dangers of Swimming in Tropical Waters’,

·      A survey of the occurrence of Rhamnus frangula (Alder Buckthorn), a source of charcoal for munition fuses.


The first is described in my book, Britain's Green Allies. Medicinal Plants in Wartime (see the opening page of this website).  The last three are described in more detail below.

 

Other projects, often smaller and unsuccessful, ranged from determining the optimal mixture of grass species for aerodromes and the suitability of Juncus gerardi as camouflage, to comparing seaweed species to find the best source of agar. The question was asked, Why was Germany importing Erica scoparia from Spain? Did its bark have antiseptic properties? An answer was never forthcoming.


In 1944, the Allies invaded the beaches of northern France (D-day) and the thoughts of the BWC naturally turned to the re-occupation of Europe. What were the new issues it might address?


From experiences gained in the blitzed cities of Britain, the BWC decided that high priority should be given to control measures to deal with outbreaks of rats, blowflies etc. due to the presence of buried and damaged food stores, etc.; the combating of dry rot in timber; mosquito control, especially in deep shelters; and clothes moths and the ‘proofing’ of blankets.   

                                                       

The man

The man whose untiring efforts helped set up the BWC and later, as Secretary, kept it running was Geoffrey Emett Blackman of Imperial College. 


Geoffrey was the son of Vernon Blackman, a botanist and one-time London flat mate of Arthur Tansley.  Geoffrey was the nephew of  Vernon's brother, FF Blackman, supervisor of Gabrielle Matthaei (see this site) and brother-in-law of Arthur Tansley.

        

Geoffrey's research concerned weed control in crops and he was was involved with pioneering work on the plant growth regulator, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D).  He was  consulted by the British government as to whether the chemical could be used to destroy German crops (something that never happened).  His reputation was to be tarnished when  2,4-D, and the closely related 2,4,5-T, were used as the primary components of the infamous ‘Agent Orange’ used by the USA in its Vietnam War, the cocktail being contaminated during its production by dioxin, a highly potent carcinogen and mutagen.  

PROJECTS PURSUED BY THE BIOLOGY WAR COMMITTEE


Living in the Jungle

The booklet, or ‘Service Manual’, would be of use to both air crews making forced landings and to troops operating behind enemy lines. For its preparation a sub-committee was setup to collect and collate information on a wide range of subjects including the fauna, the flora (particularly the common edible wild and cultivated plants and principal poisonous plants), insects, pests, diseases, native customs, methods of food preparation, and jungle craft. Besides consulting individual biologists, foresters and doctors with an expert knowledge of the area, contact was also made with travellers and serving officers with personal experience of local conditions. In addition, collateral information on the New Guinea front was obtained from the Australian Army Staff at Australia House.

The final draft was completed by July 1944 and, in consultation with the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, special drawings were prepared to illustrate the chief food and poisonous plants. The native names of these species were provided by the School of Oriental Languages.


The booklet, as produced by the War Office Section of the Stationery Office, consisted of 50 pages (7” X 4.25”) and 44 text figures. On the basis of information obtained by the Committee from the Ministry of Supply, it was printed on long fibre paper of the type specified for use in the field under tropical conditions.


On the Dangers of Swimming in Tropical Waters

The Biology War Committee (BWC) was asked by the Inter Services Research Bureau to provide information on the potential dangers likely to be encountered by crews of midget submarines, and swimmers on operational missions, in an area stretching from the Indian Ocean through the East Indies to the Australian seas.

As the matter was considered highly secret, enquiries were handled by the Executive Committee. The same procedure was adopted as in the case of the ‘Jungle booklet’ (above). The principal marine biologists with knowledge or experience of tropical and subtropical waters, resident in Great Britain, were consulted, together with other biologists and doctors who had first-hand knowledge of these regions. The main sources of information included departments of the Natural History Museum, several University departments, the Marine Biological Station, Plymouth, and the Australian Army staff.


It was possible to classify the main dangers into (a) attack by sharks and other predatory fishes, (e.g. barracoutas), moray eels, and gropers, (b) crocodiles, (c) poisonous stings from species of (i) jelly fish, (ii) stone fish, (iii) cone shells, and (iv) corals, and (d) being trapped by giant clams. For some of the risks it was also possible to assess the degree of danger, to indicate the distribution of the various species, and to define the areas or conditions where or when the potential dangers were greatest.


Recommendations were made as to the equipment of the ‘swimmers’ (e.g. type of footwear, etc.), the treatment of wounds and poisonous stings, and possible means of minimising shark attack, apart from the ‘repellents’ being developed by the Americans and tested in the Caribbean.


Charcoal for Explosives

Rhamnus frangula (= Frangula alnus), commonly known as Alder Buckthorn, is a small tree reaching 5m height. Its wood is exceptionally close-grained and ever since the 15th century it has been known by the manufacturers of gunpowder to provide the finest charcoal; prized because it ignites readily, yet burns evenly and slowly. With the development of more powerful and sophisticated explosives in WWII, demand for the charcoal grew rapidly. Thus, while the New Forest had supplied 50 tons in 1939, by 1941 the nation’s need had increased to 200 tons. The other main source of R. frangula was Wicken Fen in Cambridgeshire, but by 1941 its stock, like the New Forest’s, had been severely depleted.


Alder Buckthorn grows widely in England and Wales, though in small numbers – it is rare in Scotland and Ireland. In 1942, the BWC determined that new sources should urgently be identified. Botanists from universities around England and Wales were co-opted and on 31 March met at Wicken Fen, under the chairmanship of Prof. FT Brooks (Cambridge) to agree the regions that should be surveyed; liaison with natural history groups and with the forestry Commission was deemed important. The surveys began as soon as leaves of the Alder Buckthorn opened in mid-May.


Seemingly, there were no other sites where the plant was common enough to make commercial exploitation feasible. On 3 July 1944, Geoffrey Blackman (Secretary) reported to the BWC that ‘…further research on Rhamnus and other special charcoals was not likely to be undertaken’. He understood that, ‘alternative methods of fusing [high explosives] had been evolved’.



In the process of stripping away the bark before burning the wood for charcoal, a potentially useful drug, and a valuable export market in the USA had been overlooked for the bark contains the glucoside ‘frangulin’, which is a highly effective laxative.

Sources

Anon. 1942.  Nature, 149, 234-5.

Anon. 1944. Nature, 154, 693-4.

Papers and Correspondence of Geoffrey Emett Blackburn FRS (1903-1980).  Bodleian Library, University of Oxford, Special Collections.  CSAC 79.3.81.


Read Maud Grieve, or return to Medicinal Plants in Wartime

Share by: